see “CONCLUSION”
*Also, I’d like to know which assholes are saying “soda” in Michigan. Those are some suspicious numbers. Theory: Dickhead Californians/New Yorkers submitting false information.
Amen, losers.
I didn’t realize it until just now, but I need one of these.
the best.
IT'S SCIENCE.
Front to Back
God Bless America
I miss this thing right here.
Gross then. Gross now.
I’m going to make my own baseball bat.
I’m usually really late on funny internet stuff so forgive me if you’ve already seen this, seven people that follow me.
Also, call the number.
The rumors are true! My good friend Chuck is a contestant on this season of The Bachelorette, premiering May 18th on ABC.
Be sure to check him out!
Be sure to check me out on Dancing With The Stars next season. Also, the album drops in November.
Rule 32.2, The “Intent to Blow” Rule:
As there is a human factor involved in blowing the whistle to stop play, the Referee may deem the play to be stopped slightly prior to the whistle actually being blown. The fact that the puck may come loose or cross the goal line prior to the sound of the whistle has no bearing if the Referee has ruled that the play had been stopped prior to this happening.
The problem isn’t in the rule, it’s in the human factor.
- I don’t understand why any call would be made based on an assumption. Why would you assume that the puck is frozen, especially when you are in such a bad position to view the play?
- Isn’t there like, a TEAM of officials on the ice? NOBODY saw what ACTUALLY happened?
- Why blow the whistle, thereby making it impossible to guarantee the right call was made? If he waits to make a decision until he is in better position to do so and the puck crosses the goal line without a whistle being blown, that play can be reviewed. If the puck had been frozen, no goal. The goal was in play, so no one looks stupid.
- Should every goal be reviewable, regardless of whether or not a whistle is blown? Isn’t something like this too important to leave to people?
I hear all the analysts and journalists and players and coaches saying that one call doesn’t cost you the game. But it did. The fact is, the Wings played well enough to tie at the end of regulation. That was the situation. They all say that if they played better to start the game, they wouldn’t have to catch up from two goals down. Who’s to say? How can anyone know that? What we do know, is that the Wings played well enough to send it to O.T. and Brad Watson negated that with extremely poor judgement.
I’m tired. I was up late last night.
If you take a random sampling of personages of historical significance, you’ll find that history is one big sausage-fest.
After all,
It’s a history report, not a babe report.
a joke.
How do they make extra virgin olive oil?
With REALLY ugly olives.
The LA/OC Tumblr meet up last night was so much fun… I hope you can tell by these two photos!!
Del’s got a hairy butt.
I feel the same way about Lost.
